The SMB without an in-house expert
You need a serious look at your security, architecture or accessibility, but you have no CISO or architect on staff.
Product · Audit service
Virtual teams — a professional audit, delivered in hours.
Tooled reference frameworks that examine your digital artefacts and return a sourced, proportionate report — security, architecture, art direction, marketing, legal and more.
Each team is a method, a checklist grid and a living watch, applied the same way every time — so a third party can replay the checks. Power sized to the need.
Expert review, without the wait or the retainer.
Getting a security, architecture or accessibility audit usually means a costly engagement and weeks of waiting.
A virtual team is a reference framework turned into a tool: a documented method, a checklist grid, an up-to-date watch, and a report template. Pointed at your digital artefacts — a site, a codebase, a set of documents — it produces a professional report in hours, not weeks. Every finding carries its proof and its source; the report states what it covered and what it did not.
For anyone who needs a serious, sourced look.
The team that needs a second pair of eyes
A sourced, reproducible external review before a release, a migration or an audit.
The buyer who wants proportion
A report that recommends the simple solution when the simple solution is right — and says so.
Twelve teams built, more mapped.
A few of the reference frameworks already tooled and in service. Each returns a report with its grid filled, its proofs and its sources.
Security (CISO)
Structural security risks flagged against a documented grid, with a clearly-scoped verdict.
Architecture
Style, boundaries, data, flows, capacity and cost, sized to a measured need — decisions traced as ADRs, backup and restore tested.
Accessibility / RGAA
The legally required artefacts plus 106 verifiable criteria; contrast measured, not guessed.
Marketing & acquisition
Acquisition, positioning and content reviewed against a house grid.
Legal & contracts
Documentary compliance reviewed — what is missing, what is inconsistent — pointing to the qualified professional where the law reserves the act.
And more
Art direction, project framing, operations and maintenance, QA and testing, accounting review, pre-sales.
The limits, in the open.
Saying a limit is not an admission of weakness — it is what makes the engagement credible.
- It does not replace a regulated professional: where the law reserves an act — a lawyer’s advice, a chartered accountant’s certification, a sworn translation — the team observes and flags; it does not perform the reserved act.
- It states the rule and reports the gap; it does not give personalised legal, tax or investment advice applied to your situation.
- It does not certify the absence of every defect: it reports gaps against a framework at a point in time.
- It runs nothing destructive on a production system; the audit observes by default.
- It does not sell complexity: if a measured need does not justify it, it recommends the simple path — even when that is less impressive.
Try it
Bounded demonstration (shared quota), with no memory from one question to the next.
Test a team, right now
An online demonstration: pick a team, ask a question, read the answer. It is a taste of the tone and the method — not an audit report.
Sized to the need.
The power of an audit is dimensioned to what you actually need — the depth, the scope, the number of artefacts.
After a first exchange to scope the work, we give you a clear, itemised quote — with no surprises added at signature. A quick single-artefact review and a full multi-domain audit are not the same effort, and the price says so.
Every report states its perimeter and its sources. You pay for a defined scope, delivered.
Next step
Sourced, reproducible, proportionate. No result guaranteed beyond a defined perimeter.
Point a team at your artefacts.
Tell us what you would like audited — a site, a codebase, a set of documents — and which angle matters most. We will scope it and quote it clearly.